HKUST(GZ) Computational Media Arts
HKUST(GZ) Computational Media Arts |
|
 |
|
R. H. Campbell and M. Grimshaw, "User resistance to information system implementations: A dual mode processing perspective," Information Systems Management, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 179–195, Feb. 2016. Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard (03/06/2025, 14:32) Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard (03/06/2025, 14:33) |
 |
| Resource type: Journal Article Language: en: English Peer reviewed DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2016.1155951 ID no. (ISBN etc.): 1058-0530 BibTeX citation key: Campbell2016 Email resource to friend View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: General Keywords: ELM, HAPI, IT systems management, TAM Creators: Campbell, Grimshaw Collection: Information Systems Management |
Views: 23/23
|
Attachments
User_resistance_to_information_system_implementations_PostPrint.pdf  [11/11]
|
URLs https://www.tandfo ... 80530.2016.1155951 |
| Abstract |
|
Users often resist information system implementations and it has been established that this can cause an implementation to fail. In this paper, the user attitudes that can cause resistance are examined using an established attitude change theory from social and cognitive psychology: the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM). It is argued that users who cannot or will not think deeply about systems represent a key blockage and that their attitudes are largely based not on a system's intended benefits or other central issues but on heuristics and what ELM calls peripheral influences. The results of a wide-ranging study are presented that, in addition to supporting this argument, identifies and classifies 19 new heuristics and peripheral influences (in addition to the nine already known) that commonly, and adversely, affect user attitudes and responses to new information system implementations.
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard |
PHP execution time: 0.03364 s
SQL execution time: 0.02021 s
TPL rendering time: 0.00165 s
Total elapsed time: 0.05550 s
Peak memory usage: 2.8536 MB
Memory at close: 2.4742 MB
Database queries: 75